Asphalt Millings Vs. Gravel: A Breakdown For Your Next Project

Cost Considerations: Where the Money Goes

Looking to pave your driveway, build a new road, or even just patch up an uneven area? You’ve probably encountered two common choices: asphalt millings and gravel. Both have their own advantages, but they also come with different costs. Let’s delve into the breakdown of these materials regarding cost and explore which might be best for your specific project.

Asphalt millings are essentially recycled asphalt pieces cut from road construction projects. These bits are rich in aggregate, offering a durable and long-lasting surface at a lower price than fresh asphalt. Gravel, on the other hand, is a more traditional option made of rocks and stones, often used for driveways and pathways due to its affordability.

So, how do these two materials compare in terms of cost?

Asphalt Millings: The Value Proposition

The primary advantage of asphalt millings is their competitive price point. They’re recycled material at the very heart of construction, making them a much more eco-friendly and budget-friendly option than fresh asphalt. They’re often readily available thanks to the abundance of road repairs that take place every year.

The cost savings associated with using millings are significant. Asphalt millings can be 30% cheaper than virgin asphalt! Imagine the potential to stretch your budget further for other needs within your project. The cost difference might even allow you to achieve a larger surface area or enhance other aspects of your construction plan.

But, it’s important to remember that the true value of millings lies beyond just price. They offer several benefits:

  • Durability:
  • Asphalt millings are incredibly durable because they’re made from recycled materials and have a higher aggregate content than gravel. These characteristics contribute to their extended lifespan in paving projects.

  • Cost-Effective:
  • As mentioned, the initial cost of asphalt millings is much lower than virgin asphalt, which translates into significant savings over time.

  • Environmentally Friendly:
  • Recycling materials saves valuable resources and minimizes waste, making asphalt millings an eco-conscious choice for your paving project.

Gravel: The Solid Choice

Gravel is a cost-effective option that is particularly well-suited for smaller applications. It’s easy to install and maintain, and it provides excellent drainage.

However, gravel has some downsides, too:

  • Maintenance:
  • Gravel requires more regular maintenance than asphalt millings. It needs to be topped up or re-worked periodically, and it can become uneven over time.

  • Drainage Issues:
  • While gravel has excellent drainage capabilities, it might not always be ideal in areas prone to heavy rainfall or flooding due to the presence of large gaps between stones.

  • Lifespan:
  • Gravel has a shorter lifespan compared to asphalt millings. It’s prone to wear and tear from traffic and can become compacted over time, requiring replacement after a few years.

Making the Decision

Ultimately, choosing between asphalt millings and gravel depends on your specific project needs and preferences:

For larger projects that require long-term durability and cost efficiency, asphalt millings are the way to go. Their recycled nature and lower price point make them a compelling choice for anyone looking to save money while maintaining an impactful result.

For smaller projects or where drainage is a primary concern, gravel might be a suitable option. Its low cost and ease of installation could help you achieve your goals within budget constraints.

Remember, a thorough comparison of the pros and cons will help ensure you select the best material for your project!

As we’ve explored, asphalt millings offer a compelling alternative to fresh asphalt thanks to their affordable price point and long-lasting durability. While gravel is a solid choice for smaller projects or situations where drainage is paramount, the decision relies on your individual needs and budget constraints.