Iran's Visual Propaganda as Art of War
· side-hustles
Iran’s War of Walls: The Visual Propaganda Fueling the Conflict
As the conflict between Iran and the United States continues, a distinctive feature of Tehran’s urban landscape has emerged: large-scale, state-sponsored posters plastered across walls and buildings. These visual propaganda efforts convey the Iranian regime’s message not only to its citizens but also to the world beyond its borders.
The recent surge in this form of messaging is rooted in a long tradition of visual storytelling in Iran that predates the current regime. Sepideh Parsapajouh, an anthropologist and researcher at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), notes that this method of narrative construction through images has its roots in the pre-revolutionary “pardeh-khâni” tradition. In this practice, a storyteller would share epic tales in front of a massive painted canvas, which served as a visual representation of the story’s key events.
The shift from hand-painted murals to industrial-scale printed banners has been dramatic. This change reflects the increasing centralization and institutionalization of propaganda efforts and signifies a move away from the emotional and personal dimensions that characterized earlier iterations of this art form. Today, government bodies commission giant billboards directly, often produced by semi-governmental arts organizations.
The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) has accelerated the process and altered its content. Compositions now borrow from advertising, cinema, and blockbuster movie posters, resulting in visually sophisticated images that draw upon Western pop culture references. One notable example features a mural referencing fantasy saga “The Lord of the Rings”, displayed on the facade of a building in Fatemi Square.
While these visual propaganda efforts may be effective in conveying the Iranian regime’s message to its citizens and the world at large, they raise important questions about the role of art in times of conflict. Is this form of messaging merely a tool for spreading state-approved ideology or can it also serve as a means of critique or resistance?
The Iranian regime has permitted news agencies to photograph and officially circulate these posters, which are then widely shared by international media on social media. This calculated move aims to amplify the regime’s message beyond its borders while minimizing criticism.
The implications of this visual propaganda strategy extend far beyond Iran’s domestic audience. It speaks directly to the country’s foes and challenges them to confront their own narratives and ideologies. In an era where information warfare has become increasingly central to modern conflict, understanding the role of visual messaging in shaping public opinion is more crucial than ever.
As tensions between Iran and its adversaries continue to escalate, it will be interesting to observe how this propaganda strategy evolves. Will AI-powered visuals continue to play a central role in amplifying the regime’s message? Or will new forms of resistance or critique emerge to challenge the dominant narrative?
The war on walls will only intensify as long as the conflict rages on, with each side vying for control over the narrative and the hearts and minds of its audience.
Reader Views
- THThe Hustle Desk · editorial
The use of visual propaganda in Iran's current conflict raises questions about the efficacy of this approach. While these massive posters can certainly evoke emotional responses and create a sense of national unity, they also reinforce the regime's control over narratives and public discourse. It's worth noting that the incorporation of AI-generated images blurs the line between propaganda and art, making it difficult to discern what's authentic and what's manufactured for consumption.
- RHRiley H. · indie hacker
The visual propaganda in Iran's cities is more than just a form of messaging – it's a calculated exercise in spectacle. By incorporating AI-generated compositions and Western pop culture references, the regime is effectively co-opting the aesthetic language of globalized capitalism to serve its own ideological ends. This trend raises important questions about the nature of cultural appropriation and the ways in which propaganda can masquerade as art. What's particularly striking is how this phenomenon speaks to the contradictions inherent in modern authoritarianism: a desire for globalization and economic integration alongside a commitment to nationalist ideology and control over the narrative.
- MLMei L. · etsy seller
The fusion of propaganda and art in Iran's urban landscape is undeniably striking. While the article astutely notes the shift towards more centralized and institutionalized messaging, I believe it overlooks the implications of this trend on the local art scene. As an Etsy seller specializing in handmade posters inspired by Iranian folk art, I've noticed a decline in demand for traditional designs as younger generations increasingly consume Western-style visual propaganda. This cultural homogenization raises questions about the role of art in resistance and the consequences of abandoning Iran's unique storytelling heritage.